Criminal Lawyers in chennai
Best criminal advocate in Madras high court especially for Bails and Anticipatory bail services at Chennai.
Tuesday, 24 November 2020
SC: Concepts of joint family property explained.
Legal updates : lawyerchennai.com
High Court in India
The Indian Judicial System consists of Indian Supreme Court which stands at the peak of the hierarchy of the entire country. There are a total of twenty-one high courts at the peak of hierarchies for each state. The Indian High Court has jurisdiction about certain circumstances or during the territory group and union countries or even through the area of the union.
Under the Indian High Court there is a subordinate court hierarchy called a criminal court, family court, civil court and other district courts. All Indian High Courts are held as a constitutional court through Chapter V, Section VI and Article 214 in the Indian Constitution.
Who is the Best Lawyer for FIR Quash and Charge sheet Quashing in India. The Indian Supreme Court is the highest court for all countries established by the Indian constitution.
According to the Indian constitution, the role of the Indian Supreme Court is the same as the federal court who also acts as a guardian for the Indian constitution. This is also the place for the highest attraction for each individual.
There are also patent laws in India where the entire Indian patent system is managed or governed by the general controlling supervisor of the design patients, Indian trademark patents and also by geographical indications.
There are a total of four patent offices in India where the head office is located in Kolkata. Anyone can be given a patent for their products or services but it is important to follow the right procedure. This can be better done through professional lawyers in India.
Find the Best Criminal Lawyers for FIR Quash in Chennai India. Rajendra Law Office is one of the Best Law Firm for First Information Report Quashing and Charge Sheet Quashing in Madras High Court, Chennai India.
Monday, 18 February 2019
Tamil Nadu Asked About Gap In Salaries Of Government, Private Employees
"After implementation every pay commission recommendations, the gap between the government and private employees is widening," the Madras High Court bench noted.
MADURAI: The Madras High Court Monday asked the Tamil Nadu government why there was such a big gap in the salaries of employees of the government and private companies.
Hearing a petition relating to anomalies in the pay and the recent strike by government employees and teachers, a bench of Justices N Kirubakaran and SS Sundar said as they talk so much about their rights, they should also discharge their duties.
"After implementation every pay commission recommendations, the gap between the government and private employees is widening," the bench noted.
The judges said the work of government employees, including teachers, was as important as their demands.
Wondering why the children of government employees do not study in state-run schools, the judges asked why there should not be a rule to ensure that the children of government staff be put only in state-run schools.
Those who studied in private schools were seeking admission in government colleges, the bench said.
Counsel for Joint Action Council of Tamil Nadu Teachers Organisations and Government Employees Organisations (JACTO-GEO), which spearheaded the strike, submitted that though the government was given time to rectify the pay anomalies and several guidelines were issued, no action was taken.
The government counsel said 71 paise out of every rupee of the government's income was spent on its employees and teachers, and added the state administration was taking steps to bridge the pay gap.
Visit: https://advocates-law-firm-civil-lawyers-criminal-attorneys.business.site/
Wednesday, 6 February 2019
Chargesheets in Dabholkar, Pansare cases by next week
The CBI and the state CID are probing the killings of Dabholkar and Pansare, respectively.
CBI counsel Anil Singh told the bench that it had arrested and identified Sachin Andure and Sharad Kalaskar as the two persons who shot at Dabholkar, leading to his death.Singh said the CBI will file the supplementary charge sheet against the two by February 13.
Ashok Mundargi, the counsel for CID's Special Investigation Team (SIT) that is probing Pansare's killing, also told the court that the agency was going to file its supplementary charge sheet against three more persons arrested in the case by February 12.
Mundargi said after the charge sheet, the CID will "concentrate" on arresting the absconding accused persons in the case.
A bench of justices S C Dharamadhikari and M S Karnik accepted the submissions, but said the court expected much more from the "premiere" probe agencies.
"By the next date, you must make some concrete efforts to arrest the absconding accused," the bench said.
The court particularly told the CBI that it was a "premiere" probe agency and the court as well as the whole world expected much from it.
"These are important cases and the whole world is interested in knowing the outcome of such cases. Today, because of the advent of the social media, the whole world is watching you. It wants to know what is happening in important incidents," it said.
"Because of social media, the world is watching what you are doing in important cases, including the incident in West Bengal," the bench said, while making a passing reference to the recent face-off between the CBI and Kolkata Police in the Saradha chit fund scam case.
Dabholkar was shot dead on August 20, 2013, in Pune while he was on his morning walk, while Pansare was shot at on February 16, 2015, in Kolhapur and he succumbed to his injuries on February 20.
The high court has been hearing pleas filed by the family members of Dabholkar and Pansare seeking a court- monitored probe in both cases.
News Courtesy: PTI
Wednesday, 31 October 2018
Legislations which seeked to reduce the gender parity in India
Legislations which seeked to reduce the gender parity in India
Here are 5 judicial decisions which perambulate through time with regard to Rights of Women in India:
1. Removing the condition Of Service Of Termination Of Service On First Pregnancy
2. Sexual Harassment
3. Honour Killings and Right of Major Women to Espouse As Per Her Wish
4. Right to Maintenance of Muslim Women
5. Guidelines to Reduce Child Prostitution
Saturday, 22 September 2018
High Court hits out at Theni police in the habeas corpus petition hearing
The woman, working in a private college, had filed a complaint with the police seeking protection for her and her 29-year-old husband, fearing that they would be separated by her family.
However, the police strangely sent her to a home.
A Division Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Sathish Kumar, hearing the habeas corpus petition filed by her partner S. Sakthimanikandan, who sought a direction for his partner to be set at liberty, depreciated the action of the police. The court observed that liberty of a person cannot be infringed upon.
Advocate representing the petitioner, argued that the woman was sent to a home without any basis. He said that this was done as the woman had refused to go with her family. Moral policing should not be encouraged, he said.
The court said that though this was a case fit for making strong remarks and imposing costs, the court was refraining from doing so as it was assured by the Additional Public Prosecutor K. Dinesh Babu that the incident would not be repeated and suitable instruction would be given to the respondents concerned.
The court directed the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Theni, and the Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Andipatti, to give protection to the woman and her partner as and when required.