Wednesday, 31 October 2018

Legislations which seeked to reduce the gender parity in India

Legislations which seeked to reduce the gender parity in India

The principle of Parity has always been the heartbeat of the constitution of India. The fortification of this principle has been possible due to the judiciary's brilliant track record in coming out with certain landmark judgements which influence the course of social change by being the voice of women whose pleas and cried went unnoticed and unheard for a long time.

Here are 5 judicial decisions which perambulate through time with regard to Rights of Women in India:

1. Removing the condition Of Service Of Termination Of Service On First Pregnancy
The service condition which stated that there was to be a termination of services of air hostesses on first pregnancy was first challenged in Air India vs. Nergesh Meerza and the Supreme Court expressed that having made use of services for four years, to terminate the service on pregnancy amounts to compelling the air hostess not bear children and thus obstructing with the ordinary course of human nature. The apex court termed it a “callous and cruel act”, but also deemed it an open insult to Indian womanhood, the most sacrosanct and cherished institution. Thus it was not only manifestly arbitrary but exhibited naked despotism and is, therefore, was deemed clearly violative of Art 14. of the Constitution.

2. Sexual Harassment
To promote the contribution of women towards the development of the nation, the apex court became vigilant of the sexual harassment faced by them in the workplace and laid down the guidelines filling the vacuum in legislation in Vishaka vs. State Of Rajasthan. What was recognized by the judiciary way back in 1997, took the shape of legislation only in 2013, with the enactment of an Act in this regard. The apex court took cognizance of the rampant sexual harassment faced by women at their workplace and with the aim of boosting the contribution of women in nation building, laid down the guidelines against Sexual Harassment at Workplace in Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan. The 1997 guidelines promulgated by the Supreme Court was superseded in 2013 by the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013.

3. Honour Killings and Right of Major Women to Espouse As Per Her Wish
The apex court in Lata Singh vs. State of U.P, while expressing its concern over the spate of honour killings throughout the country, recognized the right of the petitioner woman who has attained majority to marry anyone or stay with anyone she likes. The court directed the administration and police authorities to provide protection to the victims of such barbaric acts of caste-based discrimination, to ensure that if majors undergoing inter-caste or inter-religious marriage are not harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence, and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such persons as provided by law.

4. Right to Maintenance of Muslim Women
The apex court came to the rescue of divorced Muslim women who have no means and are left to fend for themselves by applying S.125 CrPC to all, irrespective of the religion professed by them. It was held by the court in Mohd. Ahmed Khan vs Shah Bano Begum[6] that Clause (b) of the Explanation to section 125(1) of the same provision, which defines 'wife' as including a divorced wife, contained no words of limitation to justify the exclusion of Muslim women from its scope.

5. Guidelines to Reduce Child Prostitution
In Vishal Jeet vs. Union of India, the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of children as assets of the nation and issued some prominent directions to the state governments and union territories, including steps for setting up of a separate Advisory Committee within their respective zones for making suggestions regarding the measures to be taken in eradicating child prostitution and the social welfare programmes to be implemented for the care, protection, treatment, development and rehabilitation of the young fallen victims namely the children and girls rescued either from the brothel houses or from the vices of prostitution. It also issued directions for taking steps in providing adequate and rehabilitative homes manned by well-qualified trained social workers, psychiatrists and doctors and also directed the Union Government for setting up a Committee whose main object is to evolve welfare programmes to be implemented on the national level for the care, protection, rehabilitation, etc., of the young fallen victims and to make suggestions for amendments to the existing laws or for enactment of any new law, if so warranted for the prevention of sexual exploitation of children.

Saturday, 22 September 2018

High Court hits out at Theni police in the habeas corpus petition hearing

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has hit out at the Theni police, which, after receiving a complaint from a 28-year-old woman against her family apprehending separation from her husband, sent her to a home.
High Court hits out at Theni police

The woman, working in a private college, had filed a complaint with the police seeking protection for her and her 29-year-old husband, fearing that they would be separated by her family.

However, the police strangely sent her to a home.

A Division Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Sathish Kumar, hearing the habeas corpus petition filed by her partner S. Sakthimanikandan, who sought a direction for his partner to be set at liberty, depreciated the action of the police. The court observed that liberty of a person cannot be infringed upon.

Advocate representing the petitioner, argued that the woman was sent to a home without any basis. He said that this was done as the woman had refused to go with her family. Moral policing should not be encouraged, he said.

The court said that though this was a case fit for making strong remarks and imposing costs, the court was refraining from doing so as it was assured by the Additional Public Prosecutor K. Dinesh Babu that the incident would not be repeated and suitable instruction would be given to the respondents concerned.

The court directed the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Theni, and the Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Andipatti, to give protection to the woman and her partner as and when required.

Friday, 16 February 2018

DAILY LEGAL UPDATES IMPORTANT DECISIONS (16.02.2018)

DAILY LEGAL UPDATES IMPORTANT DECISIONS
(16.02.2018)

Bail - Person who surrenders in Court - He can be said to be in custody for the purpose of S.439 Cr.P.C. - Bail granted. (2014(1) Criminal Court Cases 783 (H.P.)

Contraband - Search - Non-production of original notice u/s 50 of NDPS Act - Reason not assigned - Casts serious doubt on prosecution story and fatal to prosecution case. (2018(1) Criminal Court Cases 057 (Rajasthan)

Criminal trial - Conviction based on inference - Conviction set aside. (2016(3) Apex Court Judgments 121 (S.C.)

Divorce - Cruelty meted out to child by wife - Can be treated as cruelty to husband. (2018(1) Civil Court Cases 012 (Delhi)

Divorce - Denial of sex to a spouse itself amounts to causing mental cruelty. (2017(1) Civil Court Cases 435 (Delhi)

Maintenance pendente lite - Marital status in dispute - Till marriage is declared void, wife is entitled to maintenance pendente lite. (2018(1) Civil Court Cases 077 (Madras)

Rent & Eviction - Bonafide requirement - Status, style of living and habits are the factors which need to be considered while considering bonafide requirement. (2016(1) Civil Court Cases 856 (H.P.)

Sale deed -  Execution of sale deed does not need any attesting witness like gift deed which requires at least two attesting witnesses at the time of its execution as per S.123 TPA. (2018(1) Apex Court Judgments 001 (S.C.)

Suit filed by un-registered firm - Not maintainable against any party. (2017(1) Civil Court Cases 156 (P&H)

Will - Construction - Earlier and subsequent bequest to different persons in the same Will - Where an absolute bequest is made qua certain property to certain persons then a subsequent bequest qua the same property to other persons is to be of no effect. (2017(1) Civil Court Cases 498 (S.C.) 

DAILY LEGAL UPDATES IMPORTANT DECISIONS (15.02.2018)

DAILY LEGAL UPDATES IMPORTANT DECISIONS
(15.02.2018)



  • Charas - Recovery from commercial vehicle - 


Every occupant of commercial vehicle cannot be held guilty in connection with anything being carried out by one of the occupants without there being any evidence to show that other passengers had knowledge and notice of carrying of such thing by one of the occupants. (2014(1) Criminal Court Cases 419 (H.P.)


  • Date of institution of plaint - 


Suit filed on the last day of limitation with insufficient court fee - Cannot be taken as due institution to save the suit from the bar of limitation when no explanation at all had been given for non payment of court fee. (2016(1) Civil Court Cases 721 (P&H)

  • Dishonour of cheque - 

Deemed liability does not apply in case of individual or proprietorship concern. (2018(1) Civil Court Cases 111 (Kerala) 

  • Dishonour of cheque - 

Proceedings initiated on the basis of dishonour of cheque for the second time though notice was issued but proceedings not initiated when cheque was dishonoured for the first time - Complaint is maintainable. (2017(1) Civil Court Cases 520 (Allahabad)


  • Document - Not signed by scribe - 


Scribe did not legally prove the document as it was not signed by him as is the mandate of law. (2018(1) Civil Court Cases 065 (H.P.)

  • Domestic Violence -  

Proceedings u/ss 12 and 18 to 23 are not proceedings in criminal law - Proceedings are remedial in nature which fall in the realm of civil law. (2014(1) Criminal Court Cases 592 (Rajasthan)

  • Recall of witness for further cross examination - 

Application can be considered even at the fag end of trial. (2018(1) Criminal Court Cases 147 (Jharkhand) 


  • Replication - 


Plea raised in written statement not controverted by filing replication - Does not amount to admission on the part of plaintiff. (2017(1) Civil Court Cases 431 (P&H)

  • Six FIR's - Against six Co-operative societies - 

Overlapping allegations may be that all were engaged in the same business - This fact by itself is not sufficient to quash five FIR's at the stage of investigation itself when their members are different, their area of operation is different, etc. etc. (2018(1) Criminal Court Cases 001 (S.C.)

  • Will - 

Mere non-mentioning of or about the person, likely to be adversely effected by Will,  would not itself be a ground for coming to the conclusion that Will is illegal. (2016(1) Civil Court Cases 674 (P&H) 

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 91 — Summons to produce document or other thing

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 91 — Summons to produce document or other thing:Invocation of S. 91 by accused, at the stage of framing of charge dehors satisfaction of court. For exercising such power, court has to be satisfied, that material available with investigator, not made part of charge-sheet has crucial bearing on issue of framing of charge. [Nitya Dharmananda v. Gopal Sheelum Reddy.